Legal Opinion
State v. Mendez
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 23, 2014No. 13-KA-909PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT A. CHAISSON, Judge.
lain this appeal, defendant, Jose Mendez, seeks review of his convictions and sentences for possession of cocaine and possession of a legend drug. For the reasons that follow, we affirm defendant’s conviction for possession of cocaine and his conviction and sentence for possession of a legend drug. With regard to defendant’s enhanced sentence on his possession of cocaine conviction, we amend the sentence to delete the fine and affirm his twenty-five year sentence as amended. Additionally, we grant appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw as attorney of record.
PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. OliveauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- State v. WeilandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LeBlancLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- State v. PayneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Mendez v. McCainDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
- State Of Louisiana v. Walter Terell Fisher, Jr.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- State v. CampLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017