Legal Opinion
United States v. Enrique Acosta-Sierra
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 15, 2012No. 10-50575PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge:
Defendanb-Appellant Enrique Acosta-Sierra (“Acosta-Sierra”), a 57-year-old native and citizen of Mexico who has been diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, appeals from his conviction, following a bench trial, of two counts of assault on a federal officer in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111.
Acosta-Sierra raises four claims on appeal: (1) that the district court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Rule 23(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure were insufficient to find Acosta-Sierra guilty of assault on a federal officer with a dangerous…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Gary HenryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Mekail JonesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- United States v. WaldmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Luis Ruiz-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.