Legal Opinion

Swift & Co. v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1932PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

This suit was brought, more than thirty days after payment under protest, by Swift & Company, distributors of cured and fresh meats, with a branch at Johnson City from which distribution is made in that and adjacent towns and counties, to recover a privilege tax collected under a provision of the Revenue Act of 1927, set out under the sub-head “Peddlers,” reading as follows:

“Each person, firm or corporation engaged in the business of running a wagon, truck, auto or other vehicle, and who sells and delivers candy, cigars, cigarettes and tobacco, fruits and produce, where it is not produced or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis & Co. v. Mayor of MaconSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  2. Village of Stamford v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Briscoe v. McMillanTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Ex parte TaylorMississippi Supreme Court · 1880
  5. State v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Steven Waters v. Reagan Farr, Commissioner of Revenue for the State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Holloway v. Putnam CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  3. City of Memphis v. W. M. S. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Davidson Estate v. WeeksTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Murfreesboro Bread & Ice Cream Co. v. Town of McMinnvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API