Legal Opinion
Hurlburt v. DeRosa
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 14, 2012No. AC 33890PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALVORD, J.
This action involves a claimed drainage easement over property owned by the defendants, Scott D. DeRosa, Carl F. DeRosa, Patricia A. DeRosa and Cori DeRosa Quirk. The plaintiff, Scott E. Hurlburt, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after the granting of the defendants’ motion for a judgment of dismissal for failure to make out a prima facie case. Specifically, the plaintiff claims that the court (1) misapplied the legal standard required for a dismissal under Practice Book § 15-81 and (2) improperly determined that he failed to provide evidence of harm or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Zimmerman v. CrothallCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
- City of Bristol v. Tilcon Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Berin v. OlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Sullivan v. ThorndikeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Cadle Co. v. ErratoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Deane v. KahnConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- F.E. Crandall Disposal, Inc. v. Town of LedyardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013