Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Riser Foods, Inc. v. Trimble

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1995No. 93-2626PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Riser claims that the appellate court erred in (1) admitting into evidence the Borstein letter, and (2) affirming the commission’s reimbursement denial. Riser’s arguments lack merit.

Following the completion of briefing in this case, we decided State ex rel. First Natl. Supermarkets, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 582, 639 N.E.2d 1185, which resolved the very issue currently raised. First Natl. Supermarkets held that once a self-insured employer opted out of the handicap reimbursement program, the self-insured was entitled to no further reimbursement, even in those claims in which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. First National Supermarkets, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Concord Foods, Inc. v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Riser Foods, Inc. v. TrimbleOhio Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API