De Hart v. Gray
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
LATIMER, Justice.
Appellant, Elvis DeHart, instituted this action against appellees, Raymond Gray and Almond Russell, to recover damages for false arrest and imprisonment. From judgment in favor of appellees this appeal is prosecuted.
At the time this cause of action arose Gray and Russell were highway patrolmen on duty in Daviess County. They received information through a Mr. Carlin, who operated a store near Utica, that DeHart was drunk and driving a red Chevrolet truck on the highway in a dangerous manner. These patrolmen went immediately to the scene where they first saw Mr. Carlin, who…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. UskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- State v. StorrsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
- State v. TaceySupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
- State v. MagdichWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ReederKentucky Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. WebbArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Newman v. StinsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
- St. Martin v. KFC Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1996
- Wells v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.