Legal Opinion
Lammon v. Austin
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 13, 1893No. 840PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from Superior Court, Thurston County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Stiles, J.
This was an action to foreclose a mortgage upon real estate. The note contained no provision for attorney’s fees, but the mortgage had the following clause:
“And out of the money arising from said sale to retain the said principal and interest . . . together with the costs and charges of making such sale and of suit for fore*200closure, including counsel fees at the rate of ten per cent, upon the amount which may be found to be due for principal and interest by the said decree. ’ ’
Before the time for answer expired, the defendant paid into court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Monroe v. FohlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Stover v. JohnnycakeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Wylie v. KarnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Schmidt v. PotterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
3Cited by2 opinions
- Watson v. SawyerWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Northwest Textile Assn. v. WeinsteinWashington Supreme Court · 1933