Legal Opinion

Lammon v. Austin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1893No. 840PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Thurston County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

This was an action to foreclose a mortgage upon real estate. The note contained no provision for attorney’s fees, but the mortgage had the following clause:

“And out of the money arising from said sale to retain the said principal and interest . . . together with the costs and charges of making such sale and of suit for fore*200closure, including counsel fees at the rate of ten per cent, upon the amount which may be found to be due for principal and interest by the said decree. ’ ’

Before the time for answer expired, the defendant paid into court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Monroe v. FohlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Stover v. JohnnycakeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  3. Wylie v. KarnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Schmidt v. PotterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Watson v. SawyerWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Northwest Textile Assn. v. WeinsteinWashington Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API