Legal Opinion

United States Baking Co. v. Bachman

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1893PublishedCited by 13 opinions

cited 91 U. S. 618; 1 Greenl. Ev. § 82; Id. § 87; Steph. Ev. 116, 117; 31 Eed. Hep. 313; 29 Pac. Rep. 466; 16 S. E. Rep. 638; 35 W. Ya. 258; Code, c. 100, s. 18; Beach Corp. §§ 56, 57; 121 111. 530; 130 U. S. 396; 22 W. Ya. 600. cited 2 Greenl. Ev. § 637; 1 Greenl. Ev. § 35; 1 Bar. Law Pr. 211; 1 W. Ya. 57; 3 W. Ya. 172; 8 Cal. 615; 12 Tex. 130; 6 Tex. 497; 53 Me. 544; 15 R. J. L. 412; 21 Barb. 333.

1Opinion of the Court

ENGLISH, PRESIDENT:

This was a petition filed by the United States Baking Company under section 152, c. 50, of the Code, to try the right of certain property levied on under an attachment sued out by P. Baclnnan & Sons against M. Merkel and the "Wheeling Bakery Company before W. IT. Caldwell, justice of the peace for Madison district, Ohio county.

The United States Baking Company in its petition alleges, that it was, when said attachment was issued, and has been ever since the owner of the property levied on by virtue of said attachment; while P. Bachman & Sons on the other hand claim, that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Altmeyer v. CaulfieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Cosner's Administrator v. SmithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Riley v. JarvisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Neill & Ellingham v. Rogers Bros. Produce Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Sommers v. AllenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Bank of Union v. LoebWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Reed v. McCloudWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API