Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. O'Connor

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1937No. Docket No. 77, Calendar No. 39,658PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

This is an appeal from a decree providing for separate maintenance, defendant having been ordered to pay $75 per month to Mrs. O’Connor until further order of the court and certain sums for attorney fees. Appellant claims the court should have granted appellee a decree of absolute divorce upon the pleadings and proofs.

In Walker v. Walker, 277 Mich. 279, plaintiff filed a bill for separate maintenance and a decree was entered in conformity therewith. Later, upon motion of defendant, the court modified the original decree and granted plaintiff against her will and at the desire of her adjudged…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Jersey Creamery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Zeilman v. FryMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Wardle v. CummingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. People v. PretswellMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Walker v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lilienthal v. City of WyandotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. City of Garden City v. HollandMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Associates Discount Corp. v. GearMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  4. People v. SnowMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. People v. SnowMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API