Walker v. Walker
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.
I cannot concur.
In July, 1921, plaintiff filed a bill for separate maintenance. September 8th of that year defendant made answer and, in the nature of a cross-bill, prayed for a divorce. The case was heard, the court found that defendant had no grounds for a divorce, dismissed his cross-bill and granted plaintiff separate maintenance.
That decree, with reference to payments, was amended in June, 1929, and the court at that time referred to its first finding that, under the original proofs, there was no ground upon which the defend ant was entitled to any relief, and that he was clearly to…
2Cited by1 opinion
- O'Connor v. O'ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1937