Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Jackson v. County of Amador

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 7, 2010No. C060845PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOTLAND, P. J.

Jewel Jackson sued the County of Amador and its recorder (collectively, the County), alleging that the county recorder violated section 27203 of the Government Code by “willfully, negligently, untruly and/or in a manner other than that prescribed by [the recording statutes] caused to be recorded” a durable power of attorney and two quitclaim deeds which, she asserted, had been fraudulently procured by her brother. Even though the documents had certificates of acknowledgment by a notary public, Jackson contends the county recorder breached a duty to her by failing to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Schifando v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. City of Irvine v. Southern California Association of GovernmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Jones v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lyons v. Santa Barbara County Sheriff's OfficeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API