Legal Opinion

Holt v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 20, 1993No. A93A1587PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant was convicted of burglary and he appealed. Held:

1. In his first enumeration of error, defendant contends the trial court erred in admitting a bloodstained towel into evidence, arguing that it was not relevant. We disagree. The evidence demonstrated that a burglar entered the victim’s house by breaking a windowpane; that the towel was in the house, serving as a buffer between a television set and a wooden table; and that the towel did not have bloodstains on it before the burglary. It follows that the towel was relevant to show the forcible and unauthorized…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  2. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Bruce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Ross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Dunn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Horner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API