Holt v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
McMurray, Presiding Judge.
Defendant was convicted of burglary and he appealed. Held:
1. In his first enumeration of error, defendant contends the trial court erred in admitting a bloodstained towel into evidence, arguing that it was not relevant. We disagree. The evidence demonstrated that a burglar entered the victim’s house by breaking a windowpane; that the towel was in the house, serving as a buffer between a television set and a wooden table; and that the towel did not have bloodstains on it before the burglary. It follows that the towel was relevant to show the forcible and unauthorized…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Bruce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Ross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
3Cited by2 opinions
- Horner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001