Legal Opinion
Schlegel Manufacturing Co. v. King Aluminum Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided December 11, 1973No. Civ. 3706PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WEINMAN, District Judge.
This cause came on to be considered pursuant to plaintiff’s motion to have the defendants herein held in contempt for alleged violation of the order of this Court in the form of a decree consented to by the parties which was filed in this Court on February 22, 1972. The defendants have moved this Court to stay further proceedings in this Court with regard to plaintiff’s motion for contempt, and have instituted a declaratory judgment suit in another forum against the plaintiff in this case. The declara tory judgment suit seeks to litigate the issues of patent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Butterfield v. Oculus Contact Lens CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1971
- Business Forms Finishing Service, Inc., and Raymond P. Glowiak, Counterclaim v. Palmer A. Carson and Henry KovachCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Ransburg Electro-Coating Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Spiller and Spiller, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant, Third-Party v. Ionic Electrostatic Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
3Cited by6 opinions
- Interdynamics, Inc., and Smiths Industries, Limited v. Firma Wolf, Arend Wolf, and Trans Tech, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- The Schlegel Manufacturing Company v. Usm CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Mary S. Kraly, and Cross-Appellee v. National Distillers and Chemical Corporation, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Wallace Clark & Co., Inc. v. Acheson Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- SCHLEGEL MANUFACTURING CO. v. King Aluminum Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.