Legal Opinion
Bannum, Inc. v. The City of St. Charles, Mo.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 5, 1993No. 92-3686PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
Bannum, Inc., appeals from the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment in its 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action in favor of the defendant, the City of St. Charles (the City). On appeal, Bannum claims the City violated Bannum’s equal protection rights under its former zoning scheme by prohibiting community treatment centers (CTCs) and under its amended zoning scheme by allowing CTCs only as conditional uses. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Bannum is a company in the business of operating CTCs 2 throughout the United States pursuant to contracts' with the Federal Bureau of Prisons…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gregory v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hodel v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Bituminous Materials, Inc. v. Rice County, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Mark Koscielski Barbara Bergstrom, Individually and D/B/A Koscielski's Guns and Ammo v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Bannum, Inc. v. City of Fort LauderdaleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- ECOGEN, LLC v. Town of ItalyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2006
- HAWKE YE COMMODITY PROMOTIONS, INC. v. MillerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2006
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.