Nos. 93-55478, 93-55695
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
62 F.3d 1493
33 Fed.R.Serv.3d 181, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6414,
95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,955,
Pens. Plan Guide P 23911U
Pano CONCHA, M.D. and Marta Concha, as fiduciaries and on
behalf of all the participants and beneficiaries of The Pano
Concha, M.D., a Professional Corporation Defined Benefit
Pension Plan; The Pano Concha, M.D., a Professional
Corporation Defined Benefit Plan, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Philip D. LONDON; London & Lichtenberg, an accountancy
corporation; Matthew Lichtenberg; London, Caldwell &
Lewinson; Alan B. Lewinson; Thomas F. Caldwell, Jr.;
London & Lewinson; Caldwell & Lewinson;…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Howard Wool v. Tandem Computers Incorporated, Robert C. Marshall, Henry v. Morgan, and James G. TreybigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Hiram Ash v. Eugene CvetkovCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.