Legal Opinion
United States v. Acavino
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 18, 1979No. Crim. A. 78-301PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POLLAK, District Judge.
Defendant Vincent Gangemi, Jr., has submitted three motions in which the other defendants in this criminal case have joined: (1) a motion to suppress tape recordings; (2) a motion to suppress all evidence obtained as a result of a search of the premises at 1717 S. 11th Street, Philadelphia, conducted by agents of the Drug Enforcement Administration on July 17, 1978; and (3) a motion for a severance and separate trial. An evidentiary hearing was held. For the reasons set forth below, the motions are denied.
I
The motion to suppress tape recordings is grounded on the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. AllenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Commonwealth v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- United States v. HolmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.