Legal Opinion

Heath v. Zolotoi

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided May 12, 2004No. C01-1988ZPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ZILLY, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Sanctions, docket no. 95. The Court considered the briefs submitted by the parties and the oral arguments of counsel on April 28, 2004, and the Court being fully advised, makes the following ORDER:

Background

Plaintiffs Motion for Sanctions, docket no. 95, arises from the law firm Young deNor-mandie & Oscarsson’s (“the Young firm”) failure to disclose witness statements to the plaintiff and co-defendant Central Bering Sea Fishermen’s Corporation (“CBSFC”). The Young firm represents defendants Gordon Blue,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Del P. Henry, Jr., a Single Man, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Gill Industries, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lexington Insurance v. SwansonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2007
  2. Moe v. System Transport, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 2010
  3. Aecon Buildings, Inc. v. Zurich North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2008
  4. Anastasi v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Anastasi v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Co.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API