Legal Opinion

Hendricks v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 12, 1933Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clay

Affirming.

Forrest Hendricks and his employee, Ed Smith, hacl .both accepted the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Ky. Stats., sec. 4880 et seq.). On March 10, 1931, Smith was. injured, and a little over four months later he was paralyzed in his left side and rendered wholly unable to do any kind of work. Claiming that his paralysis was the result of his injury, Smith applied to the Workmen’s Compensation Board for compensation. After an extended review of the evidence, the board found that his paralysis was caused by his; injuries, and allowed him…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beaver Dam Coal Co. v. HockerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  2. Harvey Coal Corporation v. PappasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. Chatfield v. Jellico Coal Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  4. McCombs Coal Company v. AlfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  5. Coneva Coal Corporation v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API