Legal Opinion

Chatfield v. Jellico Coal Mining Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 7, 1924PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*416Opinion op the Court by

Judge Clarke

Reversing.

Upon a former appeal it was held that the petition herein stated a cause of action for review of an aw'ard by the workmen’s compensation board upon the single question as to whether or not there was any evidence before the compensation board to sustain its award of $15.00 a week to the employe, Chatfield for the period as fixed. Jellico Coal Mining Co. v. Chatfield, 200 Ky. 842, 255 S. W. 842.

The rule for so doing, as fixed by the compensation act is, as stated in that opinion, that “if there is a conflict of evidence as to the amount of it, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beaver Dam Coal Co. v. HockerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  2. Jellico Coal Mining Co. v. ChatfieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. La Rue v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Three Rivers Oil Corporation v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  3. Jones v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. Cantrell v. StambaughCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967
  5. Benito Mining Co. v. GirdnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API