Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Benton v. Alcoa Road Storage, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 9, 2017No. CV-16-22Published

1DissentJosephine Linker Hart, Justice

The majority has failed to properly apply statutory construction in accordance with the time-honored methods that this court has hitherto employed. The proper application of our procedures for interpreting an act of the General Assembly, when done in a manner that comports with our state constitution, mandates that both attorney’s fees and expert-witness fees are “costs occasioned by the assessment” of just compensation for property condemned under eminent domain. Ark. Code Ann. § 18-15-307(c).1 Thus, Alcoa Road Storage, Inc. (Alcoa) is entitled to not only attorney’s fees but its…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Summerville v. ThrowerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Ellis v. Arkansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  3. Arkansas Department of Human Services v. KistlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. VickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API