Legal Opinion

People v. Coke

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 1964No. Crim. No. 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.

Defendant-appellant Constance Lee Coke was charged in an information with violations of Penal Code, sections 484-487 (grand theft), in that about March 15, 1962, she did feloniously take money in excess of $200 belonging to Harbour Realty Corporation and Walnut Partners. She entered a plea of not guilty after hearing on a motion to set aside the information under Penal Code, section 995. Defendant was found guilty as charged by a jury. A motion for new trial was denied and defendant was sentenced to state prison. Defendant, in propria persona, filed a notice of appeal.

Facts

Defendant applied…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. People v. WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. HathcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API