Hathorn v. Loftus
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
BRODERICK, j.
The plaintiffs, George T. and Mary Lou Clark Hathorn, appeal a ruling of the Superior Court (Abramson, J.) requiring them to pay the defendant, Attorney William R. Loftus, on a promissory note. We remand.
I
On September 24, 1987, the Hathorns purchased a group home for the elderly in Lebanon from Thomas and Jane Batchelder, who were represented by Loftus. The purchase and sale agreement recited that the sale was contingent upon the parties agreeing to a management contract. In fulfillment of this term, the parties signed an agreement to have the Batchelders manage the home. That…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Echo Consulting Services, Inc. v. North Conway BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Guaraldi v. Trans-Lease GroupSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- In Re Leon Keyser, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1953
- Balon v. Cadillac Automobile Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- Zurback Steel Corp. v. EdgcombSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Zener v. VeldeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
- West v. TurchioeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999