Legal Opinion
Philadelphia Storage Battery Co. v. Air Reduction Sales Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 1, 1921No. 8164PublishedCited by 2 opinions
At Law. Action by the Philadelphia Storage Battery Company against the Air Reduction Sales Company. On motion to strike off statement and for more specific statement.
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, District Judge.
The plaintiff sues to recover damages in the sum of $400,000, alleged to have been suffered through—
“a conflagration in wliieli were burnt, consumed, destroyed, or damaged a largo part of plaintiff's buildings, with the machinery, tools, fitting, and appliances, and stock, raw material, and material manufactured and in course of manufacture, contained in and about the same.”
[1] The conflagration is alleged to have resulted from the fact that a manifold furnished to the plaintiff by the defendant for use as an appliance for connecting cylinders of oxygen gas, furnished…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Charnogursky v. Price-Pancoast Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915