Legal Opinion

United States v. American Optical Co.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided March 19, 1965No. Civ. A. No. 62-C-206PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGignoux, District Judge

(serving by designation).

Defendants in this civil antitrust suit have moved under Fed.R.Civ.P. 34 for production of the grand jury transcripts of the testimony of all those persons who have been named by plaintiff as prospective witnesses, including those whose names have been since withdrawn. The grand jury in question returned an indictment against defendants and a corporate officer of each. Subsequent to the return of this indictment, the Government instituted the present civil action; and thereafter the Court, on defendants’ motion, stayed the criminal proceeding pending the outcome of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. United States v. Maurice RoseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Max Factor & Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API