United States v. American Optical Co.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtGignoux, District Judge
(serving by designation).
Defendants in this civil antitrust suit have moved under Fed.R.Civ.P. 34 for production of the grand jury transcripts of the testimony of all those persons who have been named by plaintiff as prospective witnesses, including those whose names have been since withdrawn. The grand jury in question returned an indictment against defendants and a corporate officer of each. Subsequent to the return of this indictment, the Government instituted the present civil action; and thereafter the Court, on defendants’ motion, stayed the criminal proceeding pending the outcome of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Maurice RoseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Max Factor & Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1966