United States v. Max Factor & Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. OLIVER, District Judge.
The question for decision is defendant’s motion filed pursuant to Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
In its motion defendant prays for an order directing “plaintiff’s attorneys to make available for inspection and copying by defendant. * * * the transcript of those portions of the testimony of the following persons who testified in 1961-63 * * * before a grand jury in United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, which concerned the business of Max Factor and Company, or which related to the subject matter of Paragraph VI of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- City of Philadelphia v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- United States v. Ben Grunstein & Sons CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1967
- Guardian Angel Cr. Union v. MetaBankDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2010
- Weisburgh v. NH Savings Bank Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993