Legal Opinion

Haas v. Burlington County

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 30, 2013No. Civil Nos. 08-1102, 10-009 (NLH/JS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILLMAN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court by way of Defendants Burlington County and Ronald Cox’s appeal [Doc. No. 74] of the November 13, 2012 Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Honorable Joel Schneider, United States Magistrate Judge, granting Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file an amended complaint in this action. The Court has considered the parties’ submissions and decides this matter pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78.

For the reasons expressed below, Defendants appeal will be denied and Judge Schneider’s Memorandum Opinion and Order granting…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. JUICE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC v. LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
  2. JUICE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC v. LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
  3. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API