Legal Opinion

Ollif v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 3, 1911No. 30656Published

The Reporters'1 statement of the case: The facts of the case will be found set forth in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBakNey, J.

The claimant in this suit is a warrant officer (boatswain) in the United States Navy, who was assigned to duty by proper orders in the West Indies, where he served from December 1, 1905, until September 10, 1906, during which time he was paid at the rate of $1,600 per annum, the same being the regular shore-duty pay prescribed for boatswain after ,12 years’ service. (R. S., sec. 1566.)

This suit is now brought to recover the sum of $121.76, it being contended that that sum is due him as 10 per cent increase on his regular pay during the above period “for shore duty beyond the seas,” under the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Prindle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API