Legal Opinion

Prindle v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 4, 1905No. 24793PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The Reporters’ statement of the case:, The facts of the case sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBooth, J.

This case is now before us on a motion for a new trial, judgment having been awarded the claimant April 18, 1905. The suit is for the recovery of increased pay and allowances for the performance of shore duty beyond seas by a naval officer. The claimant is a civil engineer in the Navy by appointment of July 22, 1879. On September 1, 1898, he attained the relative rank of commander and on January 5, 1901, that of captain. While on duty at the naval training station, San Francisco, Cal., he was detailed for duty at Honolulu, H. I., reporting for duty at Honolulu July 26, 1900, and remaining in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Berry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  2. Ollif v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1911
  3. Van Doren v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API