Legal Opinion

State of South Carolina v. United States of America

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 10, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2012-0203PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judge:

This case concerns South Carolina’s new voter ID law, Act R54. The question presented is whether that new state law is lawful under the federal Voting Rights Act. As relevant here, Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act bars state laws that have either the purpose or the effect “of denying or abridging the right to vote on account of race or color.” 42 U.S.C. § 1973c(a). The effects prong of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act measures a State’s proposed new voting law against the benchmark of the State’s pre-existing law.

For several decades, South…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Allen v. State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Crawford v. Marion County Election BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. NC NAACP State Conference v. Ken RaymondCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  2. North Carolina State Conference of NAACP v. McCroryDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
  3. Shelby County v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Frank v. WalkerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2016
  5. Marc Veasey v. Greg AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API