Legal Opinion

State v. Ricks

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 21, 1977No. 7710SC675PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the court’s failure to dismiss the case at the close of the State’s evidence due to its insufficiency. He alleges that the State produced no evidence from which a jury could reasonably infer that the act of intercourse was by force and against the will of Felicia Bellamy. We are compelled to agree.

It is well established that consent is a complete defense to an indictment charging the rape of a female over the age of twelve. State v. Henderson, 285 N.C. 1, 203 S.E. 2d 10 (1974). Consent, however, is not synonymous with submission, for submission due to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. PrimesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. McGillMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. State v. LesterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. LesterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API