Legal Opinion

State v. A. B. (In re A. B.)

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 1, 2018No. A166479Published

1Per curiam

*432*239Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him to the custody of the Oregon Health Authority for a period not to exceed 180 days and an order prohibiting him from purchasing or possessing firearms. ORS 426.130. Appellant contends that the trial court plainly erred by failing to advise him of the right to subpoena witnesses, as required by ORS 426.100(1). The state concedes that, under State v. Z. A. B. , 264 Or. App. 779, 780, 334 P.3d 480, adh'd to as modified on recons , 266 Or. App. 708, 338 P.3d 802 (2014), and State v. M. L. R ., 256 Or. App. 566, 570-71, 303 P.3d 954 (2013),…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. M. L. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. State v. Z. A. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. Z. A. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API