Legal Opinion
Cantey v. Newell Contracting Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided January 30, 1935No. 13898PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. C. T. Graydon, Acting Associate Justice.
The Newell Contracting Company was employed by the highway department of South Carolina to do certain construction work on State Highway No. 30, in Clarendon County, commonly known as Project No. 273.
The cause of action here alleged is in behalf of David Cantey, Jr., by his guardian ad litem, David Cantey, Sr., against the Newell Contracting Company and the Indemnity Insurance Company of North America as surety for alleged injuries received by David Cantey, Jr., while he was employed upon the work above…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. Powell Paving & Contracting Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- John L. Roper Lumber Co. v. LawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Caldwell v. CarrollSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Crum Et Ux. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
- MacK Manufacturing Co. v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States, for Use of Gibson v. HarmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- Ward v. Federal Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
- KLINE v. McMEEKIN CONST. CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
- Ward v. Federal Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
- Ward v. Federal Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1958