Legal Opinion
Simpson v. Superior Court
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided July 20, 2001No. BS069127PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McKAY, J.
Due to the procedural nature of this petition, this court finds the petition meritorious, but no writ of mandate need be issued. The response filed in this case is ordered stricken.
*Supp. 4Petitioner Artice Simpson (hereinafter petitioner) filed a petition for writ of mandate directing respondent, the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, to vacate its order denying petitioner’s application for waiver of court fees and costs, made pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 985. By order dated May 11, 2001, the parties were notified that this court may elect to issue the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Curle v. Superior Court of Shasta CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. FalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Municipal Court v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Ng v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Californians for Alternatives to Toxics v. California Department of Pesticide RegulationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Cruz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Simpson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001