Legal Opinion

Maffey v. Muchka

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 13, 2011No. 191008013; A145759PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

Respondent appeals the trial court’s continuation of a restraining order petitioner obtained against him under the Family Abuse Prevention Act (FAPA), ORS 107.700 to 107.735. Respondent asserts that petitioner failed to present sufficient evidence to support continuation of the order. For the reasons explained below, we disagree and, therefore, affirm.

The facts, as established by the trial court’s findings and the undisputed evidence, are as follows. At the time of the hearing regarding the continuation of the restraining order, petitioner and respondent had been in a relationship for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. B. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Fielder v. FielderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. Rosiles-Flores v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hannemann v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. Vanik-Burns v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. Daley v. DaleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Kelley v. StutzmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. J. S. E. v. CubicCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API