Legal Opinion
Wind River Multiple-Use Advocates v. Espy
District Court, D. Wyoming
Decided October 29, 1993No. 92-CV-0296-BPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BRIMMER, District Judge.
The above-entitled matter having come before the Court upon the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, and the Court having reviewed the materials on file herein, having heard argument from the parties, and being fully advised in the premises, FINDS and ORDERS as follows:
Background
The United States Forest Service is administratively empowered to manage and develop lands and resources in the National Forest System. 16 U.S.C. § 1604 (1988). As early as 1979,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wyoming v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Wyoming Timber Industry Ass'n v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2000
- Alaska v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017