Doe v. Kansas State University
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
No. 122,704 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS JOHN DOE, Appellant, v. KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY and HEATHER REED, Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 60-210(a) does not bar anonymous or pseudonymous suits where an important privacy interest is recognized. Unwitting Victim v. C.S., 273 Kan. 937, 944,
47 P.3d 392
(2002). Rather than dismiss an anonymous party's case for failure to seek permission to proceed anonymously, the district court must apply a two-part test to determine (a) whether an important privacy interest exists (a legal determination), and (b) whether…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Brokers' Choice of America, Inc. v. NBC Universal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Turner v. Halliburton Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1986
- Godin v. SchencksCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.