Legal Opinion

Caruth v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 9, 1915No. 3594PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was charged with keeping a gaming house, or permitting gaming in a house under his control.

The evidence shows it was a negro social club'. Some of the evidence shows that gaming was carried on in the house such as exhibiting a monte bank, playing craps or shooting dice. The State put a witness on the stand who was a member of the club. He denied that gaming was carried on at the club rooms. A bill of exceptions recites that after the witness had so testified the court took him in hand and examined him. This witness was a member of the organization, and was at the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Simmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. Snodgrass v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Fossett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
  4. Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Zysman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Marks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Borrer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Mendez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
  4. Bayer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Kitchens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API