Caruth v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Judge.
Appellant was charged with keeping a gaming house, or permitting gaming in a house under his control.
The evidence shows it was a negro social club'. Some of the evidence shows that gaming was carried on in the house such as exhibiting a monte bank, playing craps or shooting dice. The State put a witness on the stand who was a member of the club. He denied that gaming was carried on at the club rooms. A bill of exceptions recites that after the witness had so testified the court took him in hand and examined him. This witness was a member of the organization, and was at the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Snodgrass v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Fossett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
- Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Zysman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Marks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Borrer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Mendez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
- Bayer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Kitchens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.