Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Meda Porter v. Falkenhainer

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 18, 1928No. Three Cases, Nos. 29079, 29080, 29087PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.

William S. Porter obtained judgment in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company. A motion filed by a defendant for new trial was sustained. Porter appealed from that order and soon afterwards died. Meda Porter was appointed his administra-trix. The purpose of these three proceedings is to secure the signing and filing of her bill of exceptions in the said cause now pending-on appeal in this court.

In No. 29079 the relator prays this court to command the respondent, judge of the trial court, to make and enter all proper orders and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gary Realty Co. v. SwinneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  2. Bostick v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  3. Essey v. BushakraSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  4. Mathewson v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. State Ex Rel. Porter v. FalkenhainerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carter v. BurnsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API