Legal Opinion

Brant v. Lane

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 13, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On motion for rehearing.

1Opinion of the CourtConner, C. J.

We think this ease distinguishable from the eases of Cardwell v. Masterson, 27 Tex. Civ. App. 591, 66 S. W. 1121, and Cobb v. Barber, 92 Tex. 309, 47 S. W. 963, so earnestly urged upon us in the motion for rehearing. The case first named was a suit by a landlord against a tenant to foreclose the landlord’s lien, and against certain parties claiming as mortgagees under a mortgage from the tenant, for conversion of the property subject to the lien, and it was held that the suit against the parties converting the property, residing elsewhere, could be maintained in the county of the tenant’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cobb v. BarberTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Cardwell v. MastersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shaw v. StinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Bingham v. EmanuelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Continental Gin Co. v. PannellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Armstrong v. SawtellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API