Legal Opinion

Continental Gin Co. v. Pannell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 17, 1916No. 7647PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from Superior Court, Jefferson County ; Will Linn, Judge. Action by the Continental Gin Company against J. M. Pannell and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

EDWARDS, 0.

Tins case involves the ownership of certain gin property.' The record discloses that the plaintiff held two chattel mortgages upon such property, securing the payment of two certain notes. The first note was dated September 13, 1906, due November 15, 1907. Various payments had been made, the last being on December 16, 1908. The second note was dated October 1, 1907, due October 1, 1908, no payments having been made thereon. Chattel mortgages were executed, securing each of said notes. On January 15, 1913, the plaintiff posted notices advertising the property covered by…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Green v. Van BuskirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Hervey v. Rhode Island Locomotive WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Harrison v. SterrySupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  4. Warner v. . JaffrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Guillander v. . HowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1866

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thomas Fruit Co. v. LevergoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API