Calhoun v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Joel Brent Calhoun, the appellant, was indicted and convicted for trafficking in cannabis in violation of Alabama Code §20-2-80 (1975). Sentence was eight years' imprisonment and a $25,000 fine. Four issues are raised on appeal.
I
Calhoun argues that the search warrant was invalid because the supporting affidavit contained false information. We disagree.
A search warrant may be invalidated if the affidavit contains a material and false statement made knowingly and intentionally or in reckless disregard for the truth. Franks v. Delaware,438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978); Annot.,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Paul Rowton BailleauxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Temple v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- State v. KlarSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
- Donahoo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.