Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Espinosa

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 17, 1952No. 16566Published

1Opinion of the Court

243 P.2d 412 (1952)

125 Colo. 267

MITCHELL et al.

v.

ESPINOSA et al.

No. 16566.

Supreme Court of Colorado, en Banc.

March 17, 1952.

Johnson & Robertson, Denver, for heirs of Paul Mitchell.

Eakes & Eakes, Durango, for defendants in error.

MOORE, Justice.

We will herein refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court where plaintiffs in error were defendants, and defendants in error were plaintiffs, or by name.

The action was instituted under the provisions of Rule 105(a), R.C.P.Colo., for the purpose of obtaining a complete adjudication of the rights of the parties in and to real estate…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ohio Oil Co. v. Wyoming AgencyWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Mitchell v. EspinosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  3. Calvat v. JuhanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  4. Washburn v. Gregory Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Sims v. VosburgNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API