Holden v. Balko
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HAMILTON, District Judge.
Under Indiana common law, a tortfeasor cannot rely on a doctor’s negligent treatment of the victim’s injuries to avoid or reduce the tortfeasor’s own liability, at least so long as the victim used reasonable care in selecting a doctor. Whitaker v. Kruse, 495 N.E.2d 223, 226 (Ind.App.1986); accord, Suelzer v. Carpenter, 183 Ind. 23, 107 N.E. 467, 470-71 (1915); Restatement (Second) of Torts § 457 (1965). Indiana, like most other states, treats the risks of medical treatment as foreseeable consequences of the wrong…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brownell v. FigelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Evelyn R. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MERCHANTS NATIONAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY OF INDIANAPOLIS, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Bobbitt v. Victorian House, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Torres v. El Paso Electric Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Godbee v. DimickCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
- Haff v. HettichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Palmer v. Comprehensive Neurologic Services, P.C.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Edwards v. SislerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.