Legal Opinion

Spodick v. Gold

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSidney H. Fine, J.

The defendant, Local 210 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, moves for dismissal for insufficiency of the amended complaint. By separate motion the individual defendants, Gold and Berger, likewise move for dismissal.

Local 8 of the plaintiff International was affiliated with it until December 3, 1958, when it disaffiliated and reaffiliated and merged with the defendant local. At that time Local 8, it is claimed, was indebted to the plaintiff for the nonpayment of accrued per capita tax. In three causes of action plaintiff demands an accounting and a money judgment and other…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. CurranNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Gulf Oil Corp. v. SmallmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  3. Gulf Oil Corp. v. SmallmanNew York Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Spodick v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API