Millan v. City of Chariton
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Lucas District Court. — Hon. D. M. Anderson, Judge. Action to enjoin defendant from enforcing collection of a special assessment against property of plaintiff resulted in the dismissal of the petition. The plaintiff appeals.—
1Opinion of the CourtLaud, J.
1. corporations: street improvements: assessment of abutting The plaintiff’s lot abuts Woodlawn avenue in the city of Chariton, and is directly opposite to and of the same width as Grand Street, extending from said Avenue north and intersecting Armory, Linden, and Court Avenues, in the order named. . , _ .. In 1908 the city council ordered the pave- ° 9 ment of that portion of Grand Street in said city, extending south from the south line of Court Avenue to the south line of Woodlawn Avenue,” and “that the cost of said pavement shall be assessed to and against the property abutting thereon…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. Severns Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Kemp v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- American-First National Bank v. PetersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Anderson v. Town of AlbemarleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Kneebs v. City of SiouxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.