Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Peters v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided March 19, 2003No. 14-00-01480-CRPublished

1ConcurrenceScott Brister, Chief Justice

I disagree with the Court that admission of the contested evidence in this case was error. Sometimes the rules of evidence require us to say “Pay no attention to that sawed-off shotgun within easy reach.” Normally, we should hesitate to do so, both because we are not the ones who must face the consequences of a mistake, and because it may interfere with jurors’ expectations.1 But because the Court finds this alleged error to be harmless, I concur in its judgment.

The Relevance to the Charge

I disagree that appellant did not contest possession in this case. He did not plead guilty, nor did he…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Bigby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. United States v. George Edward Killian, United States of America v. George Edward Killian and Robert BrunkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. TanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API