Peters v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1ConcurrenceScott Brister, Chief Justice
I disagree with the Court that admission of the contested evidence in this case was error. Sometimes the rules of evidence require us to say “Pay no attention to that sawed-off shotgun within easy reach.” Normally, we should hesitate to do so, both because we are not the ones who must face the consequences of a mistake, and because it may interfere with jurors’ expectations.1 But because the Court finds this alleged error to be harmless, I concur in its judgment.
The Relevance to the Charge
I disagree that appellant did not contest possession in this case. He did not plead guilty, nor did he…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bigby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- United States v. George Edward Killian, United States of America v. George Edward Killian and Robert BrunkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. TanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.