Legal Opinion
Stonger v. Sorrell
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 11, 2001No. 52A02-0007-CV-443PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant-Respondent, Tristan V. Ston-ger (hereinafter referred to as "Stonger"), appeals the trial court's denial of his Petition to Set Aside the Court's Judgment.
We remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.1
ISSUES
Stonger raises two issues on appeal, one of which we find dispositive and restate as follows: whether the trial court applied an incorrect and erroneous legal standard of "fraud upon the court" under Ind. Trial Rule 60(B).
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On August 29, 1991, Stonger and Appel-lee-Petitioner, Beth Ann (Stonger)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Robinson v. Audi AktiengesellschaftCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Mallonee v. GrowAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Gipson v. GipsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re Paternity of TompkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stonger v. SorrellIndiana Supreme Court · 2002