Legal Opinion

King v. Longworth

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1836PublishedCited by 1 opinion

This cause was adjourned from the county of Hamilton.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Lane

stated the case, and delivered the opinion of the court:

In December, 1821, King and wife mortgaged certain tenements to Longworth, to secure the payment of a debt of two thousand dollars, fifteen hundred dollars of which was payable in eight successive annual payments, and five hundred dollars in twelve years, with interest payable annually. In February, 1833, Long-worth instituted his suit in chancery to obtain payment. In August, 1833, a final decree was rendered, in which a sale was directed, to pay the whole amount unpaid, including the five hundred dollars which had not become…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lansing v. CapronNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
  2. Smith v. KaneNew York Court of Chancery · 1830
  3. Smith v. ShulerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1825
  4. Violett v. DaleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1808

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Griffin v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API