Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cox

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 23, 1996PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Russell Cox, was convicted by a jury of two counts of murder of the first degree, 1 of criminal conspiracy 2 and of possessing an instrument of crime, 3 and one count of rape. 4 At the conclusion of the penalty phase of appellant’s trial, the jury returned a sentence of death for each of the two murder convictions. The present direct appeal ensued. We affirm.

The record reflects that appellant’s conviction resulted from an incident that occurred on February 27, 1986, in which appellant and his accomplice, Percy Lee, brutally killed Evelyn…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. ZettlemoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. FreySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. SepulvedaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. LambertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API