Legal Opinion
Genden v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 30, 1987No. 85 Civ. 7928 (WCC)PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge:
Plaintiffs James K. Genden and Alma Koppedraijer (“the Gendens”) brought this securities class action against Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith (“Merrill Lynch”) alleging that defendant failed to disclose that mortgage subsidy bonds contained in Municipal Investment Trust Funds (“MITFs”) marketed by defendants were subject to the possibility of special mandatory early redemption. Plaintiffs allege that defendant thereby violated its disclosure obligation under section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“the ’33 Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 77k(a) (1981), section…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Green v. Wolf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Dura-Bilt Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- Buford v. H & R Block, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1996
- Bolanos v. Norwegian Cruise Lines Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- In Re Playmobil Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Charlot v. Ecolab, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.